Astavalence

Start with the real work.

The product should push users into a meaningful outcome fast. Do not hide the core workflows under decorative nonsense.

View all workflows

Primary workflow

PDF

Review a slide deck

Upload a teaching deck for EDI, neurodiversity, accessibility, clarity, and evidence alignment analysis.

Fastest way to prove value

Session design

Text

Improve a teaching plan

Refine outcomes, delivery structure, learner support, and practical implementation quality.

Best for workshops and lectures

Evidence retrieval

Q&A

Ask MedEd Evidence

Get structured responses grounded in the evidence base with explicit limits where evidence is weak.

Useful, but not the homepage hero

Performance snapshot

This section gives users a fast sense of progress and usage without degenerating into vanity metrics.

Usage details

Reviews this month

32 remaining on plan

Average score

Across your latest 5 reviews

Highest risk domain

Neurodiversity

Common issue: cognitive load

Saved reports

Branded outputs ready

Recent analyses

This should become the user’s working memory. Each card should be immediately recognisable and genuinely useful.

View full archive

Slides EDI Saved

Endocrinology teaching deck

Strong scientific clarity but narrow patient representation and excessive text density across middle slides.

Overall review score: 78

Session plan Neurodiversity

Acute abdomen workshop outline

Good intent, weak signposting. Instructions need more predictability and reduced processing load.

Overall review score: 72

Q&A Evidence

Inclusive simulation design query

Evidence answer generated with cited recommendations and flagged gaps in directly relevant comparative studies.

Confidence level: moderate-high

Latest report preview

The right-hand column should prove value quickly: one sharp report summary, one evidence panel, one next-action panel.

Respiratory lecture deck review

Uploaded today • 34 slides • PDF review completed

Ready to export

EDI 82 Representation better than average

Neurodiversity 67 Main issue: inconsistent signposting

Accessibility 79 Readable, but still text-heavy

Evidence 76 Several unsupported teaching claims

Break dense explanatory slides into shorter visual chunks with explicit slide-level cues for transitions.

Add broader patient representation across ethnicity, age, skin tone, and communication style in case examples and imagery.

Insert a neurodiversity-aware orientation slide to reduce ambiguity about pace, format, and learner expectations.

Export status

78%

•

Executive summary complete

•

Domain scores generated

•

Downloadable PDF template pending brand merge

Evidence note

Recent medical education reviews support structured AI use, but not vague unsupervised deployment.

Inclusion and accessibility signals should be treated as educational design issues, not superficial polish.

Neurodivergent learners are often poorly supported when teaching materials assume one narrow way of processing information.

Evidence base

Users need quiet reassurance that the product is grounded in something real. Do not bury this behind marketing fluff.

Open methodology

Recent reviews in medical education and AI

Used for evidence-alignment and implementation caution

EDI and active inclusion guidance

Used for representation, bias, and curriculum inclusion review

Accessibility and neurodiversity frameworks

Used for usability, cognitive load, and learner support analysis

Next actions

Premium products should reduce decision fatigue. This panel tells the user exactly what to do next.

Recommended now

Upload your most-used teaching slide deck and generate a flagship review.

Save the branded PDF output and use it as a faculty development conversation starter.

Run the same workflow on an assessment brief to prove the product is not just a slide reviewer.